M-MA-ZWMS2

Practical Classes

24

1

n/a

n/a

32

640

Admitted to the second year.

pending

The main subject lessons allow the student to develop technical and performance skills, and to work on the development of creativity and knowledge of repertoire. The content of the main subject lessons is partly determined by the learning objectives as set out by the student in the study plan.

The main subject links in with other parts of the curriculum. The students learn to better control their instrument, which shows in their performances in the individual route, as well as in the performance lab. Within the main subject, they make choices and take initiatives that are based on their study plan, which they write in Connecting the Dots.

The student sets out the personal learning objectives in accordance with the skills and general objectives mentioned in Competence Matrix Master of Music.
Students attend classes with internal instructors (ArtEZ instructors). The study plan describes how the available hours for individual main subject classes will be used. Students always discuss the repertoire to be studied en played with their teachers.

(Master)classes by internal, concert visits, individually supervised by the main subject teacher(s) selected.

A great diversity of existing solo and ensemble repertoire and optionally pieces developed together with composers.

Self-study, preparation for concerts, interim auditions, internships, rehearsals.

Formative (January and June):
Public concerts throughout the year.

Summative (January):
Granting of 10 EC after the second term.
A 45-minute Pitch concept final presentation and portfolio for substantiation and justification, accompanied by
digital documentation, assessed by main subject teacher(s), mentor and research coach.

Summative (June):
Granting of 32 EC after integral assessment.
Final performance, including portfolio for substantiation and justification, accompanied by digital documentation, including a reflection report are assessed by a panel of two main subject teachers, research coach, external specialist and a peer student. Input of other (external) teachers (i.a.) counts towards the assessment. The panel is chaired by the mentor or another independent member.

See integral assessment forms Assessment Master of Music, semester 3 and Assessment Master of Music, semester 4.

The evaluators' ratings are equally weighted in the assessments, which is expressed in a mark between 1 and 10. A 5,5 or higher mark results in a pass.
After the performance, the student receives oral feedback by the chairman of the panel. This feedback is a summary of the evaluations and remarks of the various members of the assessment panel.

Formative: instructors involved give their assessments in writing, which will be put in the student's portfolio.
Summative: Panel of teachers, supervised by an examiner assess the presentation and portfolio integrally.

Additional assignment related to deficiencies or new performance.