M-JP-RES-21

Community

6

n/a

30

n/a

10 hours

158 hours

The student has successfully completed the first year.

See Competencies Matrix.

Conduct an independent study into an artistic question, theme or field relevant to their professional field. The study 
1) includes a methodology, a process and a result, in which there is a performative component and an epistemic component present, 
2) has an intersubjective character in which personal standpoints are actively questioned by and through external input (literature, interviews, web, audio, video etc), 
3) is presented in a transparent way (what, how, why, correct referencing, clearly communicated) and in a suitable form in which language-based and artistic based components are presented, and 
4) will be assessed through four categories: 1) transparency, 2) artistic content, 3) epistemic content and 4) dissemination. (for details; see rubrics) 
 

It involves developing an inquisitive attitude that applies across the curriculum 

Introductory lectures explaining and discussing the different aspects of researching and disseminating the process. 
Students choose their own subject, theme or question and write a preliminary plan 
for the outline of the work as well as their research activities

6 lectures, independent study, individual coaching upon request.

n/a

n/a

Report assessment, oral defense. 

Both the report and oral will be assessed together by using rubrics. Main criteria are: 
Transparency 
Artistic content 
Epistemic content 
Dissemination

The module is completed when the student has been awarded with Sufficient or Excellent. 
This means that all the main criteria must be at least Sufficient. 

The assessment panel consists of the own research coach and a second research coach. 
Students hand in a digital version of the research report. When they do, they are immediately scheduled for an oral exam 
Immediately following the oral defense, the assessment based on the rubrics in Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory or Excellent is announced and clarified to the student. 
The substantiation of the judgment is given for each main criterion on the assessment form. 

When no report has been handed in or when the rating is 'unsatisfactory' the student has a 2nd chance to hand in a revised version of the report and then will be scheduled for an oral exam again.